Unveiling the Values that Drive My Writing: Controversy, Honesty, and Truth



In the ever-evolving landscape of online content, where the cacophony of shallow clickbait articles often drowns out meaningful discourse, it’s essential to delve deeper and explore topics that truly matter. This article seeks to peel back the layers and reveal the core values that steer my writing on Medium. These values are not just principles I adhere to; they are the bedrock upon which I construct my articles. Join me on this journey as we explore the three pillars that shape my writing: Controversy, Honesty, and Truth.In an age where echo chambers seem to multiply, my aim is not to provoke controversy for its own sake or to shock and awe. Instead, I embrace controversy as a means of fostering dialogue around divisive issues. Society’s polarization has reached an alarming crescendo in the last decade, with people retreating into isolated bubbles of like-minded individuals. The cornerstone of a thriving democracy is open discourse, and echo chambers run contrary to this principle. Controversy, in my writing, entails addressing contentious topics — be it human rights, the Russo-Ukrainian conflict, or the nuances of wokism — through well-researched, thoughtful, and respectful discourse. I seek to create a space where diverse perspectives can coexist, where readers are encouraged to engage in meaningful conversations, and where disagreements are not stifled but rather welcomed. The comments section often becomes the crucible where ideas are refined and where I, too, learn and grow.Honesty, as a value, is intertwined with controversy. If I’m to tackle contentious subjects, it is imperative that I do so with unwavering integrity. My commitment to honesty manifests in various ways within my articles. I meticulously back my claims with robust evidence, adhering to Hitchens’ Razor, which asserts that extraordinary claims necessitate extraordinary evidence. Moreover, I make an earnest effort to present opposing viewpoints with fairness and respect. Even as I advocate for my positions, I acknowledge the validity of contrary perspectives. This intellectual honesty extends to my willingness to reevaluate and recalibrate my own views based on constructive criticism and new information. It’s a journey towards a deeper understanding of the world, one that demands transparency and ethical engagement.